[Python-ideas] Generator/Coroutiine Ontology (was async/await in Python)

[Robert Collins]

On 25 April 2015 at 16:02, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

> While it's a less significant behavioural difference than being a
> generator function, a non-empty closure could conceivably also be
> reported in the repr():
>
>     <function foo at 0x7f7dad9f7bf8 (closure)>
>     <function foo at 0x7f7dad9f7bf8 (closure,generator)>

I like this suggestion. Doing it for the await changes as well would be great.

-Rob

-- 
Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud