[Python-ideas] Generator/Coroutiine Ontology (was async/await in Python)

[Guido van Rossum]

+1

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net>
wrote:

> On 25 April 2015 at 16:02, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > While it's a less significant behavioural difference than being a
> > generator function, a non-empty closure could conceivably also be
> > reported in the repr():
> >
> >     <function foo at 0x7f7dad9f7bf8 (closure)>
> >     <function foo at 0x7f7dad9f7bf8 (closure,generator)>
>
> I like this suggestion. Doing it for the await changes as well would be
> great.
>
> -Rob
>
> --
> Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
> Distinguished Technologist
> HP Converged Cloud
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>



-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20150424/fd234389/attachment.html>