[Python-ideas] Match statement brainstorm

Franklin? Lee leewangzhong+python at gmail.com
Sun May 29 15:11:43 EDT 2016

On May 28, 2016 4:48 AM, "Greg Ewing" <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> Ethan Furman wrote:
>> Meaning we can *only* match on constructor arguments?  What about
attributes that are not set in the constructor, are we just out of luck for
> No, keyword pattern args should probably match either
> keyword constructor args or attributes.

That would make things ambiguous and tricky, wouldn't it?

Any criticism for using
    object(attrname0=v0, attrname1=v1)

for generalized attribute unpacking?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20160529/0344d187/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-ideas mailing list