[Python-ideas] PEP 530: Asynchronous Comprehensions
Yury Selivanov
yselivanov.ml at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 12:34:52 EDT 2016
On 2016-09-06 7:19 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2016-09-04 3:10 AM, Adam Bartoš wrote:
>>> will await be allowed also in the "if" part of comprehensions? And what
>>> about the "in" part? (e.g. if I'm not mistaken, we may have an asynchronous
>>> function returning an asynchronous iterator.)
>> Yes, awaits will be allowed. I'll update the PEP.
> Hasn't happened yet... I see this PEP as written in a bit of haste and
> very close to the 3.6b1 feature freeze (coming weekend). Usually I
> wouldn't accept such a hasty PEP, but the ideas in it seem pretty
> uncontroversial, and in line with the existing expectations for
> async/await.
>
> Yury, if you manage to get a working implementation signed off by one
> other core dev (not me) I can accept the PEP provisionally, under the
> same conditions as PEP 525.
>
Thank you for accepting the PEP! Will focus on the implementation now.
Yury
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list