[Python-ideas] PEP 560 (second post)

[Guido van Rossum]

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 10 November 2017 at 17:43, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>
>> There seem to be some action items from this thread that I haven't seen
>> reflected in the PEP source code yet.
>> [...snip...]
>> Then the next step I propose is a PR with a full implementation. After
>> that I'll likely approve the PEP (or we'll have minor feedback based on
>> trying the implementation).
>>
>
> Yes, sorry, I wanted to make updates to the PEP and reference
> implementation,
> but last two weeks were very busy.
> Hopefully, I will work on it this weekend.
>

Thanks, I am happy now with the PEP, except for one detail: maybe
`__mro_entry__` should always return a tuple and then maybe renamed to
`__mro_entries__`. (See debate at
https://github.com/python/peps/pull/460#issuecomment-343969528 .)

Other than that I think we just need to satisfy a process nit: let's post
the final PEP (after that issue is resolved) to python-dev.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20171113/6698b008/attachment.html>