[Python-ideas] PEP 560 (second post)

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Mon Nov 13 21:49:56 EST 2017

On 14 November 2017 at 09:41, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On 10 November 2017 at 17:43, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>>> There seem to be some action items from this thread that I haven't seen
>>> reflected in the PEP source code yet.
>>> [...snip...]
>>> Then the next step I propose is a PR with a full implementation. After
>>> that I'll likely approve the PEP (or we'll have minor feedback based on
>>> trying the implementation).
>> Yes, sorry, I wanted to make updates to the PEP and reference
>> implementation,
>> but last two weeks were very busy.
>> Hopefully, I will work on it this weekend.
> Thanks, I am happy now with the PEP, except for one detail: maybe
> `__mro_entry__` should always return a tuple and then maybe renamed to
> `__mro_entries__`. (See debate at
> https://github.com/python/peps/pull/460#issuecomment-343969528 .)

I like that - very nice refinement.


Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

More information about the Python-ideas mailing list