[Python-ideas] Fwd: New suggested built in keyword: do
Steven D'Aprano
steve at pearwood.info
Fri Jun 8 12:01:31 EDT 2018
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 10:12:01AM -0400, Randy Diaz wrote:
> I think that the keyword do would solve problems that occur when people
> want a simple way to run a command over an iterable but they dont want to
> store the data.
Why does it have to be a keyword?
I like this pair of functions:
def do(func, iterable, **kwargs):
for x in iterable:
func(x, **kwargs)
def star(func, iterable, **kwargs):
for x in iterable:
func(*x, **kwargs)
do.star = star
del star
Here's an example in use:
py> do(print, [(1, 2), (3, 4), (5, 6, 7, 8)], sep='-', end='*\n')
(1, 2)*
(3, 4)*
(5, 6, 7, 8)*
py> do.star(print, [(1, 2), (3, 4), (5, 6, 7, 8)], sep='-', end='*\n')
1-2*
3-4*
5-6-7-8*
Customize to your taste, and put them in your own personal toolbox.
--
Steve
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list