need fast parser for comma/space delimited numbers
Rick Nooner
Rick.Nooner at Level3.com
Tue Mar 21 18:15:54 EST 2000
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 08:06:55 +0000, Tony McDonald
<tony.mcdonald at ncl.ac.uk> wrote:
>In article <etdem96rar0.fsf at w20-575-110.mit.edu>, Alex
><alex at somewhere.round.here> wrote:
>
>> > what pystones are you getting on your Sparc 10?
>>
>> athena% ./src/Python-1.5.1/Lib/test/pystone.py
>> Pystone(1.1) time for 10000 passes = 3.06
>> This machine benchmarks at 3267.97 pystones/second
>>
>> I have never used pystone before, so please let me know if this is the
>> right way. Noone has bothered to upgrade python for a while around
>> here, but if you can't get the figures from anyone else, I can
>> temporarily install the latest python and run pystone on that, too.
>>
>> Hope this helps.
>>
>> Alex
>
>That seems the right way to use it Alex.
>Thanks for taking the time out to do that - I'm going to have a little
>look around our systems here and do some snooping. Our most powerful Sun
>box (Enterprise 450) if I remember rightly) gets 4500 pystones.
>
>I believe that there is a small performance gain in using 1.5.2 so
>perhaps you ought to upgrade?
>
>thanks again,
>tone.
Here are some figures from some of my machines:
Netra T1120 2x296 Mhz CPUs 3496.5 in 2.86 secs
Enterprise 250 2x296 Mhz CPUs 3558.72 in 2.81 secs
Enterprise 450 4x296 Mhz CPUs 3558.72 in 2.81 secs
Enterprise 5000 6x248 Mhz CPUs 2695.42 in 3.71 secs
This shows very clearly that pystone.py is only measuring a single CPU
which is expected since it is a single threaded, single process
program.
Rick Nooner
More information about the Python-list
mailing list