execvpe weirdness
Nathan Gray
n8gray at caltech.edu.is.my.e-mail.address
Tue Feb 20 23:43:40 EST 2001
Nathan Gray wrote:
> When I run the following script I get this error message:
>
> Error: Cannot find images in /usr/local/bin
> Apparently, Webots is not properly installed
> You must set the environment variable _HOME to the
> location of the directory and re-run .
> For example: export _HOME=/usr/local/
> or: setenv _HOME /usr/local/
> This is the error you should get if WEBOTS_HOME is not set correctly,
> but the error should complain about WEBOTS_HOME, not _HOME!
>
> Can somebody tell me where I've gone wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> -n8
OK, thanks to a dejanews search I figured out that I need to say:
execvpe(execName, [execName], os.environ)
or
execle(execName, execName, os.environ)
and I think I even understand why -- it's so you can call an executable
with something other than the name of the executable as argv[0]. I can
sorta see why this is useful, but it would be nice if the documentation
for exec* was a little more explicit about the nature of "arg0". A line
like: "Note: arg0 is traditionally the name of the executable, and
some executables will depend on this." would have saved me a lot of
hair-pulling.
Or have I misunderstood something?
-n8
--
_.~'^`~._.~'^`~._.~'^`~._.~'^`~._.~'^`~._
Nathaniel Gray
California Institute of Technology
Computation and Neural Systems
n8gray <at> caltech <dot> edu
_.~'^`~._.~'^`~._.~'^`~._.~'^`~._.~'^`~._
More information about the Python-list
mailing list