license suggestions?

Chris Watson chris at voodooland.net
Mon Jul 9 15:36:55 CEST 2001


On 9 Jul 2001, Remco Gerlich wrote:

> The typical binary only product would usually be under a license other than
> your license. And your clause 3 doesn't allow that.

Oh come on if the author of the binary only work is to LAZY to even follow
clause 3..

#  3. No changes are made to this license and/or additional terms of use
#     are placed "without prior written permission from Chris Watson."

                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

There is no problem asking me to license it to you for any license you
wish. This just gives me control to prevent GPL'ing it. It takes 30
seconds to shoot me an email to license it they way you want.

> Your license is a sort of ultra-GPL.

s/ultra-GPL/anti-GPL/


Chris





More information about the Python-list mailing list