qt or gtk?
D-Man
dsh8290 at rit.edu
Wed Jun 20 12:22:39 EDT 2001
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:52:26PM +0200, Nils O. Selåsdal wrote:
|
| "D-Man" <dsh8290 at rit.edu> wrote :
|
| > wxWindows and wxPython look nice, though I haven't worked with them
| > enough to know if I like the style of the interface.
|
| It looks like MFC to me, and MFC is NOT nice...
I was talking about the API, and I have never used MFC, so I can't
comment there.
If you mean the user interface (ie the pixels drawn on-screen)? If
so, then you are correct, but only if you are using MS Windows and
wxMFC. (I suppose one could build wxGTK on MS Windows using GTK for
windows, or an appropriate X server) wxWindows provides an API that
is constant, regardless of platform. That API is then implemented in
terms of the platform's native toolkit (wxMFC, wxGTK, wxMotif, wxMac,
others?). The end result is application (your) code that is portable
and a look-and-feel that is (almost) identical to the native
look-and-feel.
-D
More information about the Python-list
mailing list