list.sort(cmpfunc) question
Simon Budig
Simon.Budig at unix-ag.org
Fri Mar 16 18:26:42 EST 2001
Aahz Maruch <aahz at panix.com> wrote:
> In article <m1ae6lg5qt.fsf at pclabs188.labs.trema.com>,
> Harri Pasanen <harri at trema.com> wrote:
>>
>>The list.sort(cmp) docs for Python 2.0 state:
>>
>> The sort() method takes an optional argument specifying a
>> comparison function of two arguments (list items) which should
>> return -1, 0 or 1 depending on whether the first argument is
>> considered smaller than, equal to, or larger than the second
>> argument.
>
> Note that "should" carefully. The current implementation of sort() only
> checks for a negative value, but that's not a behavior that should be
> relied on in your coding. You can be sure that any anamolies in the
> behavior of cmp() will be fixed if the sort() algorithm ever changes.
As a related question since I did not find it in the documentation:
Is the sort-function guaranteed to be stable? Does it keep the order,
when cmpfunc returns 0 for a pair of items?
Thanks,
Simon
--
Simon.Budig at unix-ag.org http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/
More information about the Python-list
mailing list