Python & Linux ?

Rainy sill at optonline.net
Tue May 22 10:43:45 EDT 2001


On Tue, 22 May 2001 10:59:43 GMT, Peter Moscatt <pmoscatt at bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> Hi Remco,
> 
> Yea, ya right.... it's difficult coming in from one enviroment (Win) to 
> a new one which is totally different.
> So, if Linux programs aren't installable as such, what does the Software 
> Manager do.  I thought it got the RPM files, uncompressed them then 
> installed ??

Well that's the thing - in windows you have the program itself that
comes with an installer that installs that program and misc things
like menu entries, while in linux you have a package manager that
takes over this job (which makes sense because now every program
doesn't have to recreate this functionality).

> 
> Thanks for your help.
> 
> Pete
> 
> 
> Remco Gerlich wrote:
> 
>>Peter Moscatt <pmoscatt at bigpond.net.au> wrote in comp.lang.python:
>>
>>>I have just migrated from Win98 over to Linux.  My programming platform 
>>>under Win98 was VB.
>>>Now in Linux, I have decided to program using the Python platform.
>>>I have bought myself a get started book and from what I can gather - 
>>>Python is a Interpreter and not a Compiler, therefore only being able to 
>>>develop scripts instead of installable programs.
>>>
>>>Have I got it all wrong here ??
>>>
>>
>>On Windows, this sort of thing is irritating, but then until a recent
>>version, VB had the same thing, and it didn't bother people that much.
>>
>>On Linux, Python is usually already there. If the file starts with the
>>appropriate line (#!/usr/bin/env python) and is executable, it works just
>>like any "real" executable. There's no difference.
>>
>>And the notion of an "installable program" is something from Windows.
>>
> 


-- 
The point of philosophy is to start with something so simple as not
to seem worth stating, and to end with something so paradoxical
that no one will believe it.



More information about the Python-list mailing list