Semantic analysis of one response (was Re: Autocoding project proposal.)

phil hunt philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk
Sun Jan 27 17:03:34 CET 2002


rOn Sun, 27 Jan 2002 02:20:48 GMT, Timothy Rue <threeseas at earthlink.net> wrote:
>On 26-Jan-02 20:13:38 Courageous <jkraska at san.rr.com> wrote:
>>>I think Timothy has an idea that would make computers
>>>much easier to use, but he's making one or more of the following
>>>mistakes:
>
>>You forgot:
>
>>"Not realizing that many of the denizens of these newsgroups
>>are computer scientists engaged in active research efforts of
>>various kinds, including research into the field of computer
>>science per se, and that coming to this table with an attitude
>>of superiority and without at least somewhat having investigated
>>the prior art is more than a little bit of a mistake."
>
>Show the prior art you are refering to. If you can,  aren't just
>putting words together.

No! No! No!

*You* find and show the prior art. It is *your* project, not 
Courageous's.

It is both arrogant and stupid to expect others to do your work for 
you.


-- 
===== Philip Hunt ===== philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk =====
One OS to rule them all, one OS to find them,
One OS to bring them all and in the darkness bind them,
In the Land of Redmond, where the Shadows lie.





More information about the Python-list mailing list