Stackless Python, eventual merge?

Christian Tismer tismer at
Tue Sep 17 16:42:24 EDT 2002

Michael Chermside wrote:

> Okay, let's see if we can settle this... because I think it has real 
> potential.
> I am going to pose a hypothetical situation... please don't argue about 
> whether these conditions are true now, or whether they will be true, but 
> take these as assumptions:

Thanks a lot for this great summary.
I'd just like to do a small addition:


>  (3) Someone (probably NOT Christian) is willing to take on the job of
>      merging it into the core and maintaining it afterward.

I would of course not refuse to keep maintaining it, let it be
in the trunk or not. I was just rying to say that I'm just
not willing to fight for it by discussion any longer. I'm a coder.

Stackless is my heart code and I will do for it whatever it needs.
> ... leave Christian to do what he's doing well, and let someone else 
> worry about possible integration.

And that would be the only contribution I'm asking for.

thanks again - chris

Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer at>
Mission Impossible 5oftware  :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a     :    *Starship*
14109 Berlin                 :     PGP key ->
work +49 30 89 09 53 34  home +49 30 802 86 56  pager +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04       9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619  305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
      whom do you want to sponsor today?

More information about the Python-list mailing list