Stackless Python, eventual merge?
Martin v. Löwis
loewis at informatik.hu-berlin.de
Mon Sep 16 09:28:20 CEST 2002
Michael Schneider <michaels at one.net> writes:
> Could someone please explain to a "confused" python user. Why the
> current version of stackless python would not be distributed like
Very easy: because nobody makes it so. That, in turn, is because
nobody works on making it so.
Christian (rightfully) points out that this is not his obligation:
this is free software, he is not obliged to do anything - unless you
pay him to do something. Nobody else is obliged to incorporate
Stackless into Standard Python either. If you want this to happen,
More information about the Python-list