Stackless Python, eventual merge?

[Michael Schneider]

Thanks Martin,

That is a good news.  So there is no current technical reason,
just a resource issue (not this this is not an issue).

We are comming into beta at work, so I am pretty booked now.

In a couple of weeks, I will send email Christian, and see if I can help
this in any way.

I did see that Christian had a paypal link setup.  This is a great idea for
open source code.  If you are too booked to constribute, you can send
a little bit of money ( or alot of money).



Thanks Martin,
Mike

Martin v. Löwis wrote:

>Michael Schneider <michaels at one.net> writes:
>
>>Could someone please explain to a "confused" python user. Why the
>>current version of stackless python would not be distributed like
>>threads???
>>
>
>Very easy: because nobody makes it so. That, in turn, is because
>nobody works on making it so. 
>
>Christian (rightfully) points out that this is not his obligation:
>this is free software, he is not obliged to do anything - unless you
>pay him to do something. Nobody else is obliged to incorporate
>Stackless into Standard Python either. If you want this to happen,
>contribute.
>
>Regards,
>Martin
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20020916/956d9eec/attachment.html>