How many of you are Extreme Programmers?

Aahz aahz at
Sat Apr 19 04:02:34 CEST 2003

In article <roy-416201.21303118042003 at>,
Roy Smith  <roy at> wrote:
>"Andrew Dalke" <adalke at> wrote:
>> One thing to note, which Dijkstra didn't predict, is that I stopped
>> using a 'traditional' BASIC back in '86, when I got a copy of
>> QuickBasic for my birthday.  No line numbers, real functions,
>> better control structures, compiled code - while editing in the
>> IDE, so the compile-link-run cycle is really fast.
>I agree that all those things are good things, but by the time you've 
>made that many changes to the language, what's left that it can still 
>call itself BASIC?

Note that what Andrew describes is much closer to the original Dartmouth
BASIC (which was essentially a simplified FORTRAN) than the abominations
prevalent on the toy PCs of the 1970s and 1980s.
Aahz (aahz at           <*>

Why is this newsgroup different from all other newsgroups?

More information about the Python-list mailing list