A 'Python like' language

[JoeSmith]

I have not not run into problems with tabs.  I actually agree that it is better 
for indenting because if I want to view it as 2,3,4,5,6,7, or 8 spaces; I just 
change my editor setting.  Also, the file size is smaller.  There would also be 
slightly less parsing to do.  Any, if 3.0 does go to spaces, I will be much 
less likely to use python.

There is probably a reason why I have heard outlook referred to as outhouse.

John Roth wrote:
> The hard fact is, lots of utility programs treat
> tabs in wild and wonderful ways, many of which
> are not under the control of the user. There's
> a reason why the Python standard is spaces, and
> why tabs will be eliminated as an option in 3.0.