OT(Slightly): Thanks to Python.
John Roth
newsgroups at jhrothjr.com
Thu Mar 4 11:37:42 EST 2004
"Ville Vainio" <ville at spammers.com> wrote in message
news:du73c8ofx57.fsf at mozart.cc.tut.fi...
> >>>>> "David" == David M Cook <davecook at nowhere.net> writes:
>
> David> I would call it *pragmatically* implemented OOP. It's not
> David> "proper" as some would see it.
>
> Elaborate?
As I understand it, there are a number of issues.
1. Lack of method polymorphism
2. Use of built-in functions instead of "proper" methods.
3. ability to declare functions and variables at the
module level.
As far as I am concerned, 2 and 3 are so whats.
1 would be nice at times, but there's no way it's
going to happen in a language that doesn't have
static typing.
John Roth
>
> --
> Ville Vainio http://tinyurl.com/2prnb
More information about the Python-list
mailing list