Python Documentation Blows!
Michael
mogmios at mlug.missouri.edu
Wed Mar 31 04:15:11 EST 2004
>As was mentioned in a recent thread python is definitively
>the tool for applications with complex code and no or little UI.
>For UI-intense apps, win32 C# and delphi are still hard to beat
>
>
I wouldn't say that. Python definately benefits from portability and
easy to write and maintain code. Much better than C#, Delphi, Java, VB,
etc. Tkinter is just UGLY though. wxPython looks good and isn't hard to
code but it's hard to learn because of the bad documentation.
>Possibly a smart (and not necessarily big) wxpython book
>could prove a decisive argument for wxpython and python
>as well specifically for the "MS visual *" and delphi user
>communities
>
>
I'd like to see such a book. Maybe a couple. An in-debth book would be
great for me. A Learn Visually wxPython book for beginners would be a
good idea too.
>Is it time for the python community to commit a bit
>more to the wxwidgets/wxpython environment?
>I feel so
>
>
I lot of Python people don't like wxPython. I'm really not sure why as
it always works for me. I think wxPython is great but really needs more
of an experienced and vocal community and as I said some Python centric
documentation.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list