python coding contest
aleax at mail.comcast.net
Mon Dec 26 03:54:14 CET 2005
Simon Hengel <simon at airlangen.de> wrote:
> > Definitely, characters. A high-granularity measure is essential to
> > reduce the chance of ties. Even so there may well be equal-first-place
> > winners -- hope they're not solved in terms of first submission, since
> > submitting at 14:00 UTC is WAY easier for Europe residents (residents of
> > the Americas would have to go to bed VERY late, get up VERY early, or
> > spend extra effort setting up cron jobs), and that would bias everything
> > in a most unfair manner.
> Not sure what to do about it, is there something more fair
> than first come first serve?
Random choice between entries with identical number of characters would
be more fair, because "first come first served" strongly favours
European residents, given the timing at which entries are first
accepted, as I mentioned. Time of entry could be made a factor if the
geographical bias was removed (all entries in the first N hours of the
context could be considered as "postmarked" at the same instant, with N
computed so as to ensure some reasonable time in the evening for
residents of Asia and the Americas -- for later entries, using time of
submission is indeed fine).
If you just sent PDFs of a nicely designed color certificate of "First
Prize Ex Aequo" to all entrants who are tied for victory on the basis of
number of characters, I would not mind if the keyboard went to the
"first tied winner to submit" (since I'm not particularly keen to get
the keyboard, just the fun and kudos of claiming I'm the/a winner, in
the unlikely event my submission should be among the shortest;-).
More information about the Python-list