Did you read about that?

[ici]

On May 6, 8:55 pm, gene tani <gene.t... at gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 6, 6:26 am, "Martin P. Hellwig" <mhell... at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Dustan wrote:
> > > On May 6, 8:20 am, Steven D'Aprano
> > > <s... at REMOVE.THIS.cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 06 May 2007 04:53:23 -0700, Dustan wrote:
> > >>> SPAM!
> > >>> SPAM!
> > >>> SPAM!
> > >>> SPAM!
> > >>> SPAM!
> > >>> SPAM!
> > >>> SPAM!
> > >>> SPAM!
> > >> Gosh, you think so? I'm glad we had you around to tell us, otherwise we
> > >> might have thought it was about Python programming.
>
> > >> Actually, many of us wouldn't even have seen it in the first place,
> > >> because our ISPs do a good job of filtering out obvious spam before we
> > >> even see it. And then people like you come along, and reply to it, and we
> > >> see the reply -- complete with the original spam.
>
> > > Well, sorry. I didn't realize I'd get whacked around for making a
> > > joke.
>
> > >> --
> > >> Steven.
>
> > Aren't jokes supposed to be funny?
> > <Sorry can't resist/>
>
> > --
> > mph
>
> >http://martinphellwig.blogspot.com/
>
> What you can do:
>
> complain to Google adsense about the site's "advertising"
> complain to Google groups about the post
>
> it would be #complete unethical# for me to suggest that OP posted an
> apparently unrelated topic because he wanted the site's performance
> "ab" tested, like, y'know
>
> ab -n 100000 -kc 200http://yourspamsitehere.com

No way :( I did many times, ... RE: Google is not moderator bla, bla,
shits...