Why not 'foo = not f' instead of 'foo = (not f or 1) and 0'?

[Jarek Zgoda]

Gary Herron napisał(a):

> However there *is* a (subtle) difference between
>   not f
> and
>   (not f and 1) or 0 
> 
> The first produces a boolean value, and the second produces an int
> value, but since one is a subclass of the other, you'd have to write
> quite perverse code care about the difference.

Twisted sems to be perverted to the root.

-- 
Jarek Zgoda
Skype: jzgoda | GTalk: zgoda at jabber.aster.pl | voice: +48228430101

"We read Knuth so you don't have to." (Tim Peters)