[Pythonmac-SIG] Private frameworks - BINGO!

[Jack Jansen]

On vrijdag, augustus 23, 2002, at 11:16 , Tony Lownds wrote:
> The shared modules in lib-dynload also refer back to the 
> framework. When trying things out do an "import array"...

Hmm, that could be showstopper...

They refer back to the framework because you can't specify a 
framework as the bundle_loader (which is what I really wanted to 
do). Bummer...

Unless someone has a real bright idea (and don't even think of 
suggesting we link extensions with a flat namespace:-) I think 
we have to live with the framework living in one of the standard 
locations. It is probably also the end of any aspirations at 
BuildApplication for OSX-Python.

[thinks a while]
That is: what would happen if the shared modules also referred 
to the framework with the @executable cookie? If by any chance 
the cookie would be replaced by the pathname of the *hosting* 
application (i.e. python) then it might still work...

Anyone feels like trying this out?
--
- Jack Jansen        <Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com>        
http://www.cwi.nl/~jack -
- If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- 
Emma Goldman -