[Pythonmac-SIG] fink vs DarwinPorts?
Russell E. Owen
rowen at cesmail.net
Fri Feb 4 18:57:12 CET 2005
I've seen a lot of discussion lately about fink and darwinports and I'm
wondering if folks who have experience with either can comment on their
relative merits?
I've been building everything from source and am getting a bit tired of
it. Many of the packages have some painful gotcha that has to be worked
out (and some I've never worked out, such as installing snack for my
unix/x11 tcl/tk + python).
I installed and deleted fink a few times years ago, each time giving up
in frustration because the stuff in the "stable" area was so outdated. I
now realize if I want to use fink I have to be prepared to use the
"unstable" packages.
DarwinPorts seems to have fewer packages (for example no scipy). On the
other hand, it has more current released stuff.
There are some advantages to doing it myself (despite the pain):
- If a package I want isn't available any other way, I'm more likely to
be able to build it myself if I've built everything else myself. Because
I'll have a lot of the standard prerequisites already built and because
I'll have some experience.
- (Also, does using binaries means I'm less likely to get code optimized
for my system?)
I hope this doesn't start a flame war, but I would be very interested in
any insights people have as to the relative merits of the various
systems.
Regards,
-- Russell
More information about the Pythonmac-SIG
mailing list