[Pythonmac-SIG] gmpy universal build (static)?
Russell E Owen
rowen at cesmail.net
Wed Jan 10 19:16:37 CET 2007
In article <BEB6B93F-6A3F-419B-9EC6-0D458651D1F4 at mac.com>,
Ronald Oussoren <ronaldoussoren at mac.com> wrote:
> What I'd like to see is a collection of binary packages that are
> created from a set of recipies (somewhat like what DarwinPorts does,
> but without sucking in a second installation of unix). That way it
> should be possible to (mostly) automaticly rebuild the binary
> packages when new versions of software are released, and when a new
> version of Python is released.
I agree. I'd be nice to have a recipe for any packages on pythonmac.org
that aren't trivial to build.
(Ditto for eggs, I suppose; I've not yet tried to learn how to make eggs
-- binary or otherwise. Any good basic tutorials around?)
> In an ideal world we'd have the same set of software available for
> python 2.4, python 2.5 and Apple's python installation. The only way
> to get there is by using a toolset that does most of the work,
> manually building software and checking that everything still works
> is too much work.
That sounds wonderful -- publish a script instead of a description of
what to do. But even a recipe is much better than nothing. And to that
effect...I am willing to serve recipes for building Mac versions of
python-related software (I already serve a few). But we're talking basic
here, no wiki, no database, each recipe is a page, with one table of
contents page, you send me an update when you want to fix or improve
something.
-- Russell
More information about the Pythonmac-SIG
mailing list