[scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing
Nelle Varoquaux
nelle.varoquaux at gmail.com
Thu Dec 3 05:47:39 EST 2020
Wow… what?! That's insane…
scikit-image got some credits (
https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image-wheels/pull/47#issuecomment-736760539)
without much issue… Maybe someone should reach out directly on this thread
to the travis people?
Cheers,
N
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 11:37, Adrin <adrin.jalali at gmail.com> wrote:
> I got a response from Travis, and according to this, we don't qualify for
> the free credits:
>
> The free plan will grant your organization 10000 credits.
>
> We offer an Open Source Subscription for free to non-commercial
> open-source projects. To qualify for an Open Source subscription, the
> project must meet the following requirements:
>
>
> - You are a project lead or regular committer (latest commit in the
> last month)
> - Project must be at least 3 months old and is in active development
> (with regular commits and activity)
> - Project meets the OSD <https://opensource.org/docs/osd> specification
> -
> *Project must not be sponsored by a commercial company or organization
> (monetary or with employees paid to work on the project) *
> - Project can not provide commercial services or distribute paid
> versions of the software
>
>
> Does this sound like you and your project? We'd be very happy to support
> you!
>
> However, if your project does not match these requirements or you have
> further questions [1], please feel free to ask!
>
> We look forward to your response if you meet these requirements to proceed
> with the next steps.
>
> Thank you
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:17 AM Guillaume Lemaître <g.lemaitre58 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> ARM support
>>
>> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 01:37, Andreas C. Mueller <
>> andreasmuellerml at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry I'm probably missing some detail but what does travis provide that
>>> github actions and azure pipeline don't provide?
>>>
>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>> From: "Gael Varoquaux" <gael.varoquaux at normalesup.org>
>>> To: "Scikit-learn mailing list" <scikit-learn at python.org>
>>> Sent: 11/26/2020 6:12:12 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing
>>>
>>> >On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:06:52PM +0100, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>>> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 02:45:33PM +0100, Adrin wrote:
>>> >> > At this point I'm at a loss, and reading the NumFocus chat and
>>> other
>>> >> > packages' experience with them on the same topic, seems like we
>>> just
>>> >> > need to move out of Travis.
>>> >
>>> >> Agreed. Do we still need them for something essential?
>>> >
>>> >Sorry, ARM, it was just above in the conversation.
>>> >
>>> >I think that we have no other option than reduce the frequency of the
>>> >cron, and wait for other platforms to offer ARM, which will hopefully
>>> >happen soonish.
>>> >
>>> >G
>>> >_______________________________________________
>>> >scikit-learn mailing list
>>> >scikit-learn at python.org
>>> >https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>> scikit-learn at python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Guillaume Lemaitre
>> Scikit-learn @ Inria Foundation
>> https://glemaitre.github.io/
>> _______________________________________________
>> scikit-learn mailing list
>> scikit-learn at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-learn/attachments/20201203/d26c9695/attachment.html>
More information about the scikit-learn
mailing list