[spambayes-dev] siickkk and deprrravved stufff totallly grossssse
Glenn Brown
gbrown at alumni.caltech.edu
Mon Dec 22 20:31:43 EST 2003
> [T. Alexander Popiel]
> > Based on these clues, I'd say that you trained on one of these
> > messages as ham. That'll certainly encourage a ham classification
> > for them.
>
> Yup, looks certain -- or else Glenn makes some mighty fine distinctions
> about which kinds of porn spam he *wants* to see <wink>.
> [T. Alexander Popiel]
> > Based on these clues, I'd say that you trained on one of these
> > messages as ham. That'll certainly encourage a ham classification
> > for them.
>
> Yup, looks certain -- or else Glenn makes some mighty fine distinctions
> about which kinds of porn spam he *wants* to see <wink>.
I had "recovered from spam" that very message before scoring it and sending
the output. My intention is was to remove the message from the "spam" db,
but I forgot it moved the message to "inbox" instead of "junk suspects".
I'm sure this SNAFU effectively killed this thread, but the meme is planted.
If character repetition attacks become a problem, time will tell, and the
solution is easy...
--Glenn
More information about the spambayes-dev
mailing list