[spambayes-dev] RE: [Spambayes] How low can you go?
T. Alexander Popiel
popiel at wolfskeep.com
Sat Dec 27 01:01:24 EST 2003
In message: <LNBBLJKPBEHFEDALKOLCCEIJIAAB.tim.one at comcast.net>
"Tim Peters" <tim.one at comcast.net> writes:
>>> Ah, I've noted before that I throw away half my Unsures unclassified,
>>> because I can't tell whether they're ham or spam
>>> No part of the testing framework can be talked into believing that
>>> Unsure is the *desired* outcome for a msg, though ...
>[T. Alexander Popiel]
>> Hrm. Good point. Perhaps we should fix this, adding a third branch
>> to the testing framework's data directory tree, ...
>> And then we'd have the six error states ...
>The added complication is unattractive -- I'm OK with guessing "the right"
>category, even while believing that doesn't make sense <wink>.
Oh, good. That wasn't a bit of hackery I was looking forward to.
If you're OK with ignoring it, then I certainly am.
More information about the spambayes-dev