[spambayes-dev] Names & 1.0a6 release
Skip Montanaro
skip at pobox.com
Tue Sep 9 13:49:32 EDT 2003
Tony> Is everyone happy with the scripts/sb_* names? I had thought that
Tony> everyone was (well, with 'sb-'), but I might have misunderstood
Tony> the messages. Would people rather that we dropped the 'sb_'
Tony> prefix and installed into a spambayes scripts directory? Or
Tony> didn't drop the prefix, but still installed into the scripts
Tony> directory?
I voted previously for a spambayes directory (e.g. /usr/local/spambayes/...)
with the sb_ prefixes going away. I can live with the current formulation
though.
Tony> [This is dependant on the above]
Tony> Are we ready to go through with the 1.0a6 release?
I discovered what I thought to be a bug in the storage.py file open code.
See my earlier message on the topic though. (Maybe I was simply calling
sb_filter.py incorrectly.)
Skip
More information about the spambayes-dev
mailing list