[spambayes-dev] Names & 1.0a6 release

Skip Montanaro skip at pobox.com
Tue Sep 9 13:49:32 EDT 2003


    Tony> Is everyone happy with the scripts/sb_* names?  I had thought that
    Tony> everyone was (well, with 'sb-'), but I might have misunderstood
    Tony> the messages.  Would people rather that we dropped the 'sb_'
    Tony> prefix and installed into a spambayes scripts directory?  Or
    Tony> didn't drop the prefix, but still installed into the scripts
    Tony> directory?

I voted previously for a spambayes directory (e.g. /usr/local/spambayes/...)
with the sb_ prefixes going away.  I can live with the current formulation
though. 

    Tony> [This is dependant on the above]

    Tony> Are we ready to go through with the 1.0a6 release?

I discovered what I thought to be a bug in the storage.py file open code.
See my earlier message on the topic though.  (Maybe I was simply calling
sb_filter.py incorrectly.)

Skip



More information about the spambayes-dev mailing list