[spambayes-dev] Names & 1.0a6 release

[Richie Hindle]

[Tony]
> Is everyone happy with the scripts/sb_* names?  I had thought that everyone
> was (well, with 'sb-'), but I might have misunderstood the messages.  Would
> people rather that we dropped the 'sb_' prefix and installed into a
> spambayes scripts directory?  Or didn't drop the prefix, but still installed
> into the scripts directory?

I don't feel strongly either way, but if it came to a vote I'd vote for
using the sb_ prefix and adding the scripts to a standard location on the
PATH.  I find it a pain in the bum to have to specify /usr/local/apache
(or whatever it's called - I have to find it every time) to do stuff with
Apache (for example).  I know I could add it to my PATH, but having a big
unwieldy PATH is a pain in the bum as well.  

[FWIW, I preferred sb- as a prefix, and we could have used it by stripping
 the scripts down to an "import spambayes.xxx; spambayes.xxx.main()", but
 I don't feel strongly about that either.  Get off the fence, Richie!]

-- 
Richie Hindle
richie at entrian.com