[spambayes-dev] 1.0 Build Testing (please!)
Kenny Pitt
kenny.pitt at gmail.com
Wed Sep 29 16:00:02 CEST 2004
Tony Meyer <tameyer at ihug.co.nz> wrote:
> I would prefer to keep them separated, so that if you do reply, you just
> delete an invalid address, rather than have to modify one. (Or if you just
> send it anyway, at least the message gets through, as well as you getting a
> bounce).
That makes sense. I didn't realize that having the classification
appear as a separate address was the original intent.
> (If we were to change anything, I would replace the comma with a space.
> Then people could change the classification names to "[spam]", "{spam}",
> "{[(jjuunnkk)]}" or whatever, as they pleased, and it would look relatively
> neat).
Another possibility would be to provide configuration options for both
a prefix and a suffix for the subject modification. This is what
POPFile does. You could define the prefix as "[" and the suffix as "]
" (that's "]<sp>" in case it wraps badly) and your modified subject
would then look like "[classification] original subject".
--
Kenny Pitt
More information about the spambayes-dev
mailing list