[Spambayes] Email client integration -- what's needed?
Fri Nov 1 23:18:51 2002
>>>>> "TP" == Tim Peters <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
TP> [Jeremy Hylton]
>> The pop proxy is great for people who use pop, but lots of people
TP> Name 362. Ha!
Guido and at least 361 other people <wink>.
>> Even for people who use pop, the proxy doesn't help with training
>> at all. So I'm afraid it's just a mess for non-Windows users.
TP> I don't know that means it can't be less of a mess, though. For
TP> example, I expect we could use a common Training class, which
TP> manages a database of opaque message objects and takes care of
TP> things like calling appropriate classifier methods at
TP> appropriate times, and remembering which messages have been
TP> trained on as what. Mark invented a bunch of code like that for
TP> the Outlook client, but there's really nothing Outlook-specific
TP> about it apart from the all Outlook-specific bits <wink>. Those
TP> could be factored out, though.
I should look at integrating Mark's code and my own training system
based on VM folders. See what common code falls out.