[Spambayes] x-hammie-disposition in pop3proxy

[Tim@mail.powweb.com]

Has there been any thought given to additional classifications, beyond ham|unsure|spam?  Like, ham|probablyham|unsure|probablyspam|spam, with 
corresponding cutoffs specified in Options?  I don't know if that's interesting to anybody at all...

I could see X-Spambayes-Classification: probablyspam being useful as a range of mail that should be checked manually...

- TimS

11/2/2002 6:48:48 PM, Tim@mail.powweb.com, Stone@mail.powweb.com, Four Stones Expressions <tim@fourstonesExpressions.com> wrote:

>X-Spambayes-Classification
>
>Perfect.
>
>- TimS
>
>11/2/2002 6:40:02 PM, "T. Alexander Popiel" <popiel@wolfskeep.com> wrote:
>
>>In message:  <ibq8susf6iep85oa89viu4l2os3in5gbpt@4ax.com>
>>             Richie Hindle <richie@entrian.com> writes:
>>>Hi Van,
>>>
>>>> It's good to be in a group where someone else cares!
>>>
>>>Definitely.  But aren't most technical groups like that?  Being a language
>>>geek is a direct consequence of being a geek of any kind, isn't it?  8-)
>>
>>Not a direct consequence, but there is a high correlation.
>>I've never run chi-square on it, though. ;-)
>>
>>>The question is, does 'judgement' look as wrong to American eyes as
>>>'judgment' does to British ones?
>>
>>Not to this American's eyes... but I tend to go for the British versions
>>of many words, so it might just be an affectation.
>>
>>>Or maybe the *real* question is, shall we call the header
>>>X-Spambayes-Classification?
>>
>>I like that one.
>>
>>- Alex
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Spambayes mailing list
>>Spambayes@python.org
>>http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes
>>
>>
>- Tim
>www.fourstonesExpressions.com 
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Spambayes mailing list
>Spambayes@python.org
>http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes
>
>
- Tim
www.fourstonesExpressions.com