[Spambayes] Spambayes Header Format

[Richie Hindle]

Hi Skip,

> I still like "X-Ham-Status: {yes,no,unsure}" but never saw any responses pro
> or con to the idea, which I mentioned a couple times.  Did those messages
> ever turn up on the list?

Yes, I saw them, but didn't have a strong opinion on it so I kept quiet.

I prefer "X-Spambayes-Classification: Spam" to "X-Ham-Status: No" for a
couple of reasons: the former contains the word 'Spam' in at least one
place, or two for spams.  It contains the word 'Spambayes', which
immediately tells you the name of the software that added the header (or at
least gives you something to tell Google you Feel Lucky about).

I like the 'Ham' word as well (notwithstanding the non-pig-eaters, who I
doubt will be offended), but not enough to want it in the name of the
header itself - using it as a header value is enough to make it a visible
USP.

All MHO.

-- 
Richie Hindle
richie@entrian.com