[Spambayes] Spam clues for 0% spam
Kenny Pitt
kennypitt at hotmail.com
Mon Dec 13 17:06:34 CET 2004
Skip Montanaro wrote:
> I suppose the interesting thing was that it actually scored a solid
> 0.0 for you, not that it needed training.
Yep. This is the first time since I started my training over from scratch a
couple of months ago that any spam has scored less than Unsure. After
training, though, the message went from a solid 0% to a solid 100%. It'll
be interesting to see what happens next time somebody mentions Google in a
real message (oops, guess I just did <wink>).
--
Kenny Pitt
More information about the Spambayes
mailing list