[Spambayes] email evades Spambayes
rolph at 110.net
Fri Nov 26 03:38:26 CET 2004
I did t his.
I can confirm the following:
If the CAPA command is given SOME of the time the server connection fails
to close after the QUIT command. Under these conditions, the pop3 proxy
passes the commands for the next session(s) without filtering the
email. It is moderately reproducible.
I also have tow cases under 1.0 where this occurred even with very simple
pop3 commands sequences, but I have been unable to crisply reproduce this.
At 03:06 PM 11/26/2004 +1300, Tony Meyer wrote:
> > When I d/l'ed my email this am this one came through with no
> > indication that SpamBayes had checked it. Everything else had
> > X-Spambayes-Classification headers with the ham/spam/unsure
> > value. Is there anything in this that can let it evade SpamBayes?
> > Or did SpamBayes just hiccup?
>This is really weird - and a bit concerning since there was a similar report
>recently. I can't think of any way that mail could be downloaded through
>SpamBayes and not get either a X-Spambayes-Classification header or a
>X-Spambayes-Exception header, or crash.
>If this happens again, could you switch to running sb_server in verbose mode
>in your bayescustomize.ini file) and see if there's anything unusual in the
>_pop3proxy.log file that will get created?
>If it doesn't happen again, it was probably just cosmic alignment or
>Please always include the list (spambayes at python.org) in your replies
>(reply-all), and please don't send me personal mail about SpamBayes.
>http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/writing/reply_all.html explains this.
>Spambayes at python.org
>Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
The Rolphs rolph at 110.net
More information about the Spambayes