[stdlib-sig] Proposal: new "interpreter" module

Steven Bethard steven.bethard at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 17:01:23 CEST 2008

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Christian Heimes <christian at cheimes.de> wrote:
>  Once the pyvm module is implemented the sys module should only contain
>  system methods which can be implemented by all flavors of Python.

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> This is exactly the type of separation I want to see.
> Sound good to people? If so, who wants to take this on?

2008/4/4 Benjamin Peterson <musiccomposition at gmail.com>:
> If there is further support, I will.

I don't know how much more further support you need, but I'm 100%
behind the idea. If you need any more help, let me know.

I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a
tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity.
        --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy

More information about the stdlib-sig mailing list