[stdlib-sig] Proposal: new "interpreter" module
musiccomposition at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 17:27:20 CEST 2008
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Steven Bethard <steven.bethard at gmail.com>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Christian Heimes <christian at cheimes.de>
> > Once the pyvm module is implemented the sys module should only contain
> > system methods which can be implemented by all flavors of Python.
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> > This is exactly the type of separation I want to see.
> > Sound good to people? If so, who wants to take this on?
> 2008/4/4 Benjamin Peterson <musiccomposition at gmail.com>:
> > If there is further support, I will.
> I don't know how much more further support you need, but I'm 100%
> behind the idea. If you need any more help, let me know.
I'm starting the PEP now...
> I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a
> tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity.
> --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the stdlib-sig