[stdlib-sig] Choosing a name for simplejson
Benjamin Peterson
musiccomposition at gmail.com
Thu Apr 10 23:06:38 CEST 2008
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> So simplejson is going to be added to the stdlib (this came down from
> up high, which is why there has not been more of a discussion here).
> That means we need to choose a name. Obviously 'json' would work, but
> I am not sure if there is something better. Remember, we want simple
> so that if someone goes, "I wonder if Python has a JSON module", they
> can easily find it (which means no crazy package names).
+1 for "json" or "jsonlib". Simple is better.
>
> We might also act as quality control on the source code to make sure
> it is up to snuff based on PEP 8.
I'll have a look.
>
> -Brett
> _______________________________________________
> stdlib-sig mailing list
> stdlib-sig at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig
>
--
Cheers,
Benjamin Peterson
More information about the stdlib-sig
mailing list