[stdlib-sig] Suggested tweaks to http and xmlrpc packages

Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Tue Feb 5 21:16:42 CET 2008


On Feb 4, 2008 1:03 PM, Alexandre Vassalotti <alexandre at peadrop.com> wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2008 2:38 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> > So the suggestions now are:
> >
> > httplib ->http.client
> > http.server proposal stays.
> >
> > xmlrpclib -> xmlrpc.client
> > xmlrpc.server proposal stays.
> >
>
> `xmlrpclib` also contains (un)marshaling tools, so it's not strictly a
> client library. Anyway, I like the "client" subpackage name more than
> "tools."
>

Well, I went ahead and made the change in the PEP (since the renamings
won't happen until Guido clears the PEP none of this is in stone,
although I don't want to constantly change the PEP either).

-Brett


More information about the stdlib-sig mailing list