[Types-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.

Guido van Rossum guido@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Thu, 02 Dec 1999 16:17:19 -0500

It's time for the twice yearly ritual of looking for comatose SIGs.
From the archives, it looks like the types-sig is the only dud amongst
the crowd: all other SIGs are doing well (some are doing *extremely*
well, like the doc-sig and the matrix-sig).

The types-sig hasn't had traffic since August (4 messages) and in all
of 1999 it has only has 12 messages.

Type-sig, what do you have to say for yourself?

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)