1999-December Archives by Author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Dec 2 21:17:19 1999
Ending: Fri Dec 31 09:38:47 1999
Messages: 614

• [Types-sig] VB Types   David Ascher
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered HARD   David Ascher
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered HARD   David Ascher
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered HARD   David Ascher
• [Types-sig] Keyword arg declarations   David Ascher
• [Types-sig] Keyword arg declarations   David Ascher
• [Types-sig] Re: [String-SIG] Python parser in Python?   John Aycock
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   John Ehresman
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Paul Everitt
• [Types-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered HARD   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Static name checking   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Static name checking   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Types sig dead or alive   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Re: RFC 0.1   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] List of FOO   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Shadow File Opinions?   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] List of FOO   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] minimal or major change? (was: RFC 0.1)   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] A challenge   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Progress   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Interface files   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Handling attributes   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Implementability   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Type annotations   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Type annotations   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Interface files   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Interface files   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Type annotations   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] typedefs (was: New syntax?)   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Issue: definition of "type"   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] A challenge   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] minimal or major change? (was: RFC 0.1)   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Basic questions   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Return of the Docstring: The Typening   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Issue: definition of "type"   Martijn Faassen
• [Types-sig] Interfaces (was: definition of "type")   Martijn Faassen
• [meta-sig] Re: [Types-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Fred L. Drake, Jr.
• [Types-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Jim Fulton
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Jim Fulton
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Jim Fulton
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Jim Fulton
• [Types-sig] Interfaces: Scarecrow implementation v 0.1 isavailable   Jim Fulton
• [Types-sig] Intefaces work summary and Python code available   Jim Fulton
• [Types-sig] Types sig dead or alive   Jim Fulton
• [Types-sig] Types sig dead or alive   Jim Fulton
• [Types-sig] Types sig dead or alive   Jim Fulton
• [Types-sig] I like the new look of the types-sig page!   Jim Fulton
• [Types-SIG] Python vs. Smalltalk/Strongtalk, etc. Was: The Types- SIG is comatose.   Golden, Howard
• [Types-sig] "Open-World" design using generic Java: Lesson for Py thon?   Golden, Howard
• [Types-sig] Re: RFC 0.1   Golden, Howard
• [Types-sig] Pascal style declarations   Golden, Howard
• [Types-sig] Re: Pascal style declarations   Golden, Howard
• [Types-sig] Re: Pascal style declarations   Golden, Howard
• [Types-sig] What is the Essence of Python? (Was: Low-hanging frui t: recognizing builtins)   Golden, Howard
• [Types-sig] A challenge   Golden, Howard
• [Types-sig] What is the Essence of Python? (Was: Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins)   Golden, Howard
• [Types-sig] What is the Essence of Python?   Golden, Howard
• [Types-sig] What is the Essence of Python?   Golden, Howard
• [Types-sig] Greg Stein's writeup (was RFC 0.1)   Tim Hochberg
• [Types-sig] Conformance model   Tim Hochberg
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Michael Hudson
• [Types-sig] Re: [meta-sig] Re: The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Jeremy Hylton
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Jeremy Hylton
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Jeremy Hylton
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Jeremy Hylton
• [Types-sig] Plea for help.   Jeremy Hylton
• [Types-sig] Plea for help.   Jeremy Hylton
• [Types-sig] expression-based type assertions (was: Static typing considered ...UGLY)   Jeremy Hylton
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Bill Janssen
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Bill Janssen
• [Types-sig] Shadow File Opinions?   Bill Janssen
• [Types-sig] Shadow File Opinions?   Bill Janssen
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   M.-A. Lemburg
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   M.-A. Lemburg
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   M.-A. Lemburg
• [Types-sig] Pascal style declarations   Tony Lownds
• [Types-sig] A challenge   Tony Lownds
• [Types-sig] Syntax   Tony Lownds
• [Types-sig] tuples (was: New syntax?)   Tony Lownds
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   John Machin
• Anti-poking lobby (was:Re: [Types-sig] type declaration syntax)   John Machin
• [Types-sig] Re: Pascal style declarations   Roger Masse
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   Roger Masse
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered HARD   Gordon McMillan
• [Types-sig] Plea for help.   Gordon McMillan
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered HARD   Skip Montanaro
• [Types-sig] Global analysis - anything available?   Skip Montanaro
• [Types-sig] challenge response (was: A challenge)   Skip Montanaro
• [Types-sig] Interface files   Skip Montanaro
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   Skip Montanaro
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Skip Montanaro
• [Types-sig] consensus(?) summary (was: Type annotations)   Skip Montanaro
• [Types-sig] doc-sig/types-sig clash?   Skip Montanaro
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Skip Montanaro
• [Types-sig] Module Attribute visibility   Skip Montanaro
• [Types-sig] A plea for quoting consistency...   Skip Montanaro
• [Types-sig] check.py (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   Skip Montanaro
• [Types-sig] Run time arg checking implemented   Skip Montanaro
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   Skip Montanaro
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered HARD   Uche Ogbuji
• [Types-sig] So What is Python Anyway?   Uche Ogbuji
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered HARD   Uche Ogbuji
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered HARD   Uche Ogbuji
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered HARD   Uche Ogbuji
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered HARD   Uche Ogbuji
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered HARD   Uche Ogbuji
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Paul
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] List of FOO   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] A case study   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] A challenge   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Implementability   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Re: RFC 0.1   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] List of FOO   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Interface files   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] challenge response (was: A challenge)   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Handling attributes   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] expression-based type assertions   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] minimal or major change? (was: RFC 0.1)   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Re: [Doc-SIG] Sorry!   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Implementability   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] A challenge   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Type annotations   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Type annotations   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] A challenge   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Module Attribute visibility   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] A lurker's comment   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] What is the Essence of Python?   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Keyword arg declarations   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Keyword arg declarations   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] doc-sig/types-sig clash?   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] A challenge   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Keyword arg declarations   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] I've collected my thoughts...   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Type Inference II   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] List of FOO   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Syntax   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] List of FOO   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Keyword arg declarations   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Syntax   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Issue: binding assertions   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Issue: definition of "type"   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] RE: [String-SIG] Python parser in Python?   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] check.py (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Type checks   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] Type checks   Tim Peters
• [Types-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] VB Types   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] VB Types   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered HARD   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Static name checking   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered HARD   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Types sig dead or alive   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Static name checking   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Types sig dead or alive   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Plea for help.   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Static name checking   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: Static typing considered ... UGLY   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Plea for help.   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Plea for help.   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: Static typing considered HARD   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Plea for help.   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: transformer.py (was: Plea for help.)   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: Static typing considered HARD   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Type inferencing   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] List of FOO   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] IsInstance   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Module protection   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] type-safe declaration   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: RFC 0.1   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Avoiding innovation   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Sorry!   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: Inferencing: A case study   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: Inferencing: A case study   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Type inferencing   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: Static typing considered ... UGLY   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] List of FOO   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Shadow File Opinions?   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Compile-time or runtime checks?   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Type inferencing   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: Pascal style declarations   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: expression-based type assertions (was: Static typing considered...UGLY)   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Shadow File Opinions?   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Progress   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Handling attributes   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Implementability   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] check_type()   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Interface files   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] What is the Essence of Python? (Was: Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins)   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: [Doc-SIG] Sorry!   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Type annotations   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Type annotations   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Type annotations   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Interface files   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: The role of PyObjects   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Attributes proposal   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Module Attribute visibility   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Type annotations   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Module Attribute visibility   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] consensus(?) summary (was: Type annotations)   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] consensus(?) summary (was: Type annotations)   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Optionality and performance   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Syntax   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] List of FOO   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Easier?   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Syntax   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Optionality and performance   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Issue: binding assertions   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] parameterized typing (was: New syntax?)   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Issue: definition of "type"   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Any   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Issue: binding assertions   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Issue: binding assertions   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Optionality and performance   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Python parser in Python?   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Issue: definition of "type"   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Issue: definition of "type"   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Issue: definition of "type"   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Basic questions   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Basic questions   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Non-conservative inferencing considered harmful   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis (was: Recursive types)   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Back to basics   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Non-conservative inferencing considered harmful   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Back to basics   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.01   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.01   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] const (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Interface files   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] RFC Comments   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Type checks   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Interface files   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] check.py   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] check.py (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] const (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   Paul Prescod
• Duplicate declarations Re: [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] RFC Comments   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Type checks   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] const (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: Conformance model   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] RFC Comments   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] check.py (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] const (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   Paul Prescod
• Duplicate declarations Re: [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.4   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: rebinding (was: const)   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: syntax (was: check.py)   Paul Prescod
• [Types-sig] Re: Static typing considered HARD   Stephen Purcell
• [Types-sig] Re: Static typing considered HARD   Stephen Purcell
• [Types-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] RE: [meta-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Plea for help.   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] I like the new look of the types-sig page!   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] A case study   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Re: RFC 0.1   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] type-safe declaration   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] IsInstance   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] List of FOO   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Type inferencing   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Plea for help.   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Avoiding innovation   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Re: Inferencing: A case study   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Type inferencing   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Re: Inferencing: A case study   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Compile-time or runtime checks?   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Shadow File Opinions?   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] A challenge   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Global analysis - anything available?   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Low-hanging fruit: recognizing builtins   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Re: [Doc-SIG] Sorry!   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Interface files   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Module Attribute visibility   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Keyword arg declarations   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] tuples (was: New syntax?)   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] development approach (was: Syntax)   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Recursive types (was: Basic questions)   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis (was: Recursive types)   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   Guido van Rossum
• [Types-sig] Return of the Docstring: The Typening   Evan Simpson
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Evan Simpson
• [Types-sig] Re: Pascal style declarations   Peter Sommerfeld
• [Types-sig] Re: The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] changing variable types (was: Static typing considered HARD)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Plea for help.   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] transformer.py (was: Plea for help.)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Plea for help.   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Plea for help.   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Re: Static typing considered ... UGLY   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] expression-based type assertions (was: Static typing considered ...UGLY)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Type inferencing   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Pascal style declarations   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] expression-based type assertions   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Re: Pascal style declarations   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Re: Pascal style declarations   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Re: Pascal style declarations   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Re: expression-based type assertions   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Re: Pascal style declarations   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] List of FOO   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Shadow File Opinions?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Compile-time or runtime checks?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] minimal or major change? (was: RFC 0.1)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] hehe... sorry, too...   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] challenge response (was: A challenge)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Progress   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Shadow File Opinions?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] What is the Essence of Python?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Handling attributes   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Interface files   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] separate files (was: Sorry!)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Module Attribute visibility   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] consensus(?) summary (was: Type annotations)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] challenge response (was: A challenge)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] doc strings (was: Sorry!)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] bunch o' stuff (was: minimal or major change?)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Attributes proposal   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] check_type()   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Module Attribute visibility   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Keyword arg declarations   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] typedefs (was: New syntax?)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] parameterized typing (was: New syntax?)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Keyword arg declarations   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] I've collected my thoughts...   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Re: [Types Sig] Progress   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Viper Type specification   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Viper Type specification   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Optionality and performance   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] tuples (was: New syntax?)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Syntax   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] what tools? (was: Type Inference I)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Syntax   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Optionality and performance   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] development approach (was: Syntax)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Issue: binding assertions   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Issue: definition of "type"   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Any   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Issue: binding assertions   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Optionality and performance   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] private names (was: Type Inference II)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Re: decl f: def(_T, _T) -> _T (fwd)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] parameterized typing   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Issue: definition of "type"   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] computing typedecl objects (was: New syntax?)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] typedefs (was: New syntax?)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Issue: definition of "type"   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Issue: definition of "type"   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] polymorphic code (was: A challenge)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] type-assert operator optimizations (was: New syntax?)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Basic questions   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Basic questions   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Basic questions   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Interfaces   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] compatibility (was: tuples)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Basic questions   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis (was: Recursive types)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Basic questions   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Greg Stein
• FWD: [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] type-assert operator optimizations   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Issue: definition of "type"   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] type-assert operator optimizations   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Non-conservative inferencing considered harmful   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Non-conservative inferencing considered harmful   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Back to basics   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] examples (was: recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Non-conservative inferencing considered harmful   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Back to basics   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Viper module compiler begun   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Viper module compiler begun   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] merry christmas... here is a demo!   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] type inference/deduction (was: recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] const (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] const (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Help?   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Type checks   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] const (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] check.py (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] check.py   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] const (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Type checks   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] RFC Comments   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] rebinding (was: const)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] syntax (was: check.py)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] english words in Python (was: check.py)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] import vs include (was: RFC Comments)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] class/module interfaces (was: const)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] decls and typedefs (was: RFC Comments)   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] Re: Conformance model   Greg Stein
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Christian Tismer
• [Types-sig] RFC 0.1   Christian Tismer
• [Types-sig] Re: Pascal style declarations   Christian Tismer
• [Types-sig] Re: Pascal style declarations   Christian Tismer
• [Types-sig] Shadow File Opinions?   Christian Tismer
• [Types-sig] A challenge   Christian Tismer
• [Types-sig] A lurker's comment   Christian Tismer
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   Christian Tismer
• [Types-sig] A challenge   Christian Tismer
• [Types-sig] Viper Type specification   Christian Tismer
• [Types-sig] Type Inference II   Laurence Tratt
• [Types-sig] Re: Py2C speed benefit   Bill Tutt
• [Types-sig] Viper module compiler begun   Bill Tutt
• [Types-sig] Viper module compiler begun   Bill Tutt
• [meta-sig] Re: [Types-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   Barry A. Warsaw
• [Types-sig] Types sig dead or alive   Barry A. Warsaw
• [Types-sig] Static typing considered ... UGLY   Edward Welbourne
• [Types-sig] Re: Static typing considered ... UGLY   Edward Welbourne
• [Types-sig] expression-based type assertions   Edward Welbourne
• [Types-sig] Re: [Doc-SIG] Sorry!   Edward Welbourne
• [Types-sig] Re: [Doc-SIG] Sorry!   Edward Welbourne
• [Types-sig] Re: [Doc-SIG] Sorry!   Edward Welbourne
• [Types-sig] What is the Essence of Python?   Edward Welbourne
• [Types-sig] What is the Essence of Python?   Edward Welbourne
• [Types-sig] Attributes proposal   Edward Welbourne
• [Types-sig] A lurker's comment   lannert@uni-duesseldorf.de
• [Types-sig] The Types-SIG is comatose. Let's retire it.   mengx@nielsenmedia.com
• [Types-sig] separate files (was: Sorry!)   scott
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   scott
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   scott
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.01   scott
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   scott
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   scott
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   scott
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   scott
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   scott
• [Types-sig] check.py (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   scott
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   skaller
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   skaller
• [Types-sig] Easier?   skaller
• [Types-sig] Type Inference II   skaller
• [Types-sig] List of FOO   skaller
• [Types-sig] Viper Type specification   skaller
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   skaller
• [Types-sig] Re: [Types Sig] Progress   skaller
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   skaller
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   skaller
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   skaller
• [Types-sig] Viper Type specification   skaller
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   skaller
• [Types-sig] List of FOO   skaller
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   skaller
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   skaller
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   skaller
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   skaller
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   skaller
• [Types-sig] Type Inference I   skaller
• [Types-sig] Viper Type specification   skaller
• [Types-sig] Re: what tools? (was: Type Inference I)   skaller
• [Types-sig] New syntax?   skaller
• [Types-sig] Type Inference II   skaller
• [Types-sig] Basic questions   skaller
• [Types-sig] Interfaces (was: definition of "type")   skaller
• [Types-sig] Basic questions   skaller
• [Types-sig] type-assert operator optimizations (was: New syntax?)   skaller
• [Types-sig] typedefs (was: New syntax?)   skaller
• [Types-sig] Issue: definition of "type"   skaller
• [Types-sig] type-assert operator optimizations   skaller
• [Types-sig] Non-conservative inferencing considered harmful   skaller
• [Types-sig] type-assert operator optimizations   skaller
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   skaller
• [Types-sig] recursive types, type safety, and flow analysis   skaller
• [Types-sig] Run time arg checking implemented   skaller
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   skaller
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   skaller
• [Types-sig] Multiple dispatch [for interest only]   skaller
• [Types-sig] Viper module compiler begun   skaller
• [Types-sig] Viper module compiler begun   skaller
• [Types-sig] merry christmas... here is a demo!   skaller
• [Types-sig] Viper module compiler begun   skaller
• [Types-sig] Viper module compiler begun   skaller
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   skaller
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   skaller
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   skaller
• [Types-sig] Interface files   skaller
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   skaller
• [Types-sig] RFC Comments   skaller
• [Types-sig] const (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   skaller
• [Types-sig] Help?   skaller
• [Types-sig] const (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   skaller
• [Types-sig] Type checks   skaller
• [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   skaller
• [Types-sig] Type checks   skaller
• [Types-sig] check.py (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   skaller
• [Types-sig] check.py   skaller
• [Types-sig] RFC Comments   skaller
• [Types-sig] Conformance model   skaller
• [Types-sig] const (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   skaller
• [Types-sig] const (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   skaller
• Duplicate declarations Re: [Types-sig] PyDL RFC 0.02   skaller
• [Types-sig] type declaration syntax   skaller
• [Types-sig] Run time arg checking implemented   skaller
• [Types-sig] RFC Comments   skaller
• [Types-sig] const (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   skaller
• [Types-sig] const (was: PyDL RFC 0.02)   skaller
• [Types-sig] Re: Conformance model   skaller
• [Types-sig] Conformance model   skaller
• [Types-sig] Type checks   skaller

Last message date: Fri Dec 31 09:38:47 1999
Archived on: Mon Dec 4 15:47:14 2000

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...