[Types-sig] Types sig dead or alive

[Jim Fulton]

Paul Prescod wrote:
> 
> Jim, I am happy to temporarily banish interface discussions from the
> sig.

I'd prefer that it be permanent. I'll also reiterate that
I'd like the Class-Type unification to be taken out too.
 
> But...is it likely that you guys will have some Zope-interface
> experience by the conference?

Don't know. It probably depends on Martijn Faassen, who sort 
of volunteered to do Zope integration. :)

> I'm sure you guys are as up-to-the-wazoo
> as the rest of us but it would be cool if we could get a mini-report on
> whether the interfaces proposal *works*.

Yes it would, however I can't make any promises to do this myself 
(or commit DC), but I *am* willing to work with Martijn or anyone 
else who wants to take the lead for now.

Note that, even if the implementation isn't exercised in the next
month, there would be progress since Spam7 to report on.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton           mailto:jim@digicool.com   Python Powered!        
Technical Director   (888) 344-4332            http://www.python.org  
Digital Creations    http://www.digicool.com   http://www.zope.org    

Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email
address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my
permission.  Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will
result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for
repeats.