[Web-SIG] WSGI adoption

[David Warnock]

Alan,

> I've got to say, I was disappointed when I read about the brand new 
> Quixote 2.0 release, and saw that there was not a single mention of WSGI 
> in the README or CHANGES files.

Agreed.

> I haven't looked at the Quixote 2.0 code at all. Perhaps there is code 
> in there for WSGI, or someone has Quixote/WSGI code sitting on their 
> hard-disk somewhere?

Nope. But I did get this on the mailing list from Neil Schemenaur 
<nas at mems-exchange.org>:

> I wrote:
> 
>>> [WSGI support] not my goal.  One of my goals is to have Quixote
>>> work with as many HTTP servers as possible and to make it easy to
>>> switch between them.
> 
> 
> Upon that response is probably more cryptic than necessary.  What I
> mean is that WSGI support itself means nothing to me.  If supporting
> WSGI allows me to achieve my real goal then it will be supported.
> 
>   Neil

Dave
-- 
David Warnock: Sundayta Ltd. http://www.sundayta.com