[Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0

Phillip J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Thu Oct 4 19:47:52 CEST 2007

At 06:58 PM 10/4/2007 +0200, Manlio Perillo wrote:
>But why you are against adding a new environ value (not necessary named
>wsgi.asynchronous), that will explicitly state if the WSGI server will
>interleave the WSGI application?

Why do you think it's useful?

More information about the Web-SIG mailing list