[Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0

[Manlio Perillo]

Phillip J. Eby ha scritto:
> At 01:02 PM 10/8/2007 +0200, Manlio Perillo wrote:
>> Supporting "legacy" and "huge" WSGI applications is not really a
>> priority for me.
> 
> Then you should really make it clear to your users that your Nginx 
> module does not support WSGI.  The entire point of WSGI is to allow 
> "legacy" (i.e. already-written applications) to be portable across 
> servers.  Something that doesn't run existing WSGI apps is clearly not 
> WSGI.
> 

[Here I respond to the latest post of Graham, too.]

Right, but actually nginx mod_wsgi *can* execute every WSGI application 
in a *conforming* way (I'm completing full support for WSGI 2.0, and 
after this I will implement WSGI 1.0).

Of course some classes of WSGI applications runs *better* if they don't 
block the nginx process loop too much, so that nginx can serve multiple 
requests at the same time.

It is simply a matter of optimized execution.


Regards  Manlio Perillo