[XML-SIG] RDF Parser -> PyXML

[Uche Ogbuji]

> > Why don't we set Redfoot up as the "redfoot" CVS module and reserve
> > the package name xml.rdf for it? (As in, let it require PyXML and
> > then install itself to ../site-package/_xmlplus/rdf/.) If a decision
> > is made to keep it separate or merge it in later, there are no real
> > disruptions for user code. Is this reasonable, or am I off my rocker
> > again?
> 
> Using the "redfoot" name for this would not be appropriate for the reason I
> give above: RDF parsing / serialization is only a tiny part of Redfoot.
> Other parts of Redfoot may be appropriate to donate later on but what we're
> talking about now is small.

Agreed.  That's why I had in mind xml.rdf.

> Personally, I don't care whether it is part of PyXML or not. I just want to:
>     - make it easier for Python people to use RDF
>     - to encourage RDF people to use Python

Yes.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com 
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python