[XML-SIG] XML Canonicalization

[Martin v. Loewis]

> He suggested xml.dom.utils, but I wonder if there's any prospect of
> generalizing it so that it would work with SAX streams.  Based on his
> DOM ops, I guess probably not.
> 
> So maybe xml.dom.ext.c14n

xml.dom.ext sounds better than xml.dom.utils, since I dislike packages
with only a single module, and because it is also an extension.

I'm not whether people can make sense out of c14n - I certainly
couldn't, although it is a cute name. 'normalize' would not be
appropriate, would it?

Regards,
Martin