[XML-SIG] XML Canonicalization
Martin v. Loewis
Thu, 17 May 2001 22:12:36 +0200
> He suggested xml.dom.utils, but I wonder if there's any prospect of
> generalizing it so that it would work with SAX streams. Based on his
> DOM ops, I guess probably not.
> So maybe xml.dom.ext.c14n
xml.dom.ext sounds better than xml.dom.utils, since I dislike packages
with only a single module, and because it is also an extension.
I'm not whether people can make sense out of c14n - I certainly
couldn't, although it is a cute name. 'normalize' would not be
appropriate, would it?